15 services · Independently tested

Best Liquid Staking Protocols 2026

The 15 best liquid staking protocols in 2026 — Lido, Rocket Pool, Frax, Mantle mETH, and more. Scored on decentralization, receipt-token liquidity, validator diversity, and integrations.

Last updated: August 14, 2026

Filter by:All Beginners Security Derivatives Defi

Jump to:#1 Lido #2 Rocket Pool (rETH)#3 Frax Finance (frxETH/sfrxETH)#4 Mantle (mETH)#5 Coinbase (cbETH)#6 Binance (BETH)

🥇

Lido

Best for: Blue-chip liquid stakingRank #1

Overall Score

9.5/10

Score breakdown

Security

9.0

Fees

9.3

9.5

Features

9.5

Support

8.7

Reputation

9.7

Pros

Largest ETH LST
stETH deepest DeFi collateral
Non-custodial
Withdrawals live since 2023

Cons

Validator concentration concerns
Slashing pooled

Founded2020TVL~$25BCategoryLSDTokenstETH

Full Review →Visit Site ↗

🥈

Rocket Pool (rETH)

Best for: Decentralized ETH LSDRank #2

Overall Score

9.2/10

Score breakdown

Security

9.7

Fees

9.0

8.7

Features

9.0

Support

8.5

Reputation

9.5

Pros

Permissionless node operator set
rETH value-accruing (no rebase)
Solid DeFi integrations
Rocket Pool Saturn upgrade roadmap

Cons

Smaller share than Lido
RPL collateral requirement for node ops

Founded2021 mainnetTVL~$2BModelValue-accruing rETHFee14% of rewards

Full Review →Visit Site ↗

🥉

Frax Finance (frxETH/sfrxETH)

Best for: Yield-max ETH LSDRank #3

Overall Score

8.8/10

Score breakdown

Security

8.7

Fees

9.3

8.7

Features

8.7

Support

8.0

Reputation

8.7

Pros

Highest APR of major LSTs
Two-token model (frxETH + sfrxETH)
Deep Curve pool liquidity
Frax ecosystem tie-ins

Cons

Smaller TVL than Lido/Rocket Pool
Complexity of two-token model

Founded2022TVL~$500MModelTwo-token (frxETH + sfrxETH)NotableHighest APR of majors

Full Review →Visit Site ↗

Mantle (mETH)

Best for: Mantle-native LSD with Cook Finance

Overall Score

8.6/10

Score breakdown

Security

8.7

Fees

8.7

Features

8.5

Support

8.0

Reputation

8.5

Pros

Native to Mantle L2
cmETH restaked variant
Growing DeFi integrations
Strong Mantle ecosystem incentives

Cons

Mantle-focused
Newer than top-tier LSTs

Founded2023ChainMantle L2 primaryTVL~$1.5BNotablecmETH restaked variant

Full Review →Visit Site ↗

Coinbase (cbETH)

Best for: US-regulated LSD receipt

Overall Score

8.7/10

Score breakdown

Security

9.3

Fees

8.0

8.7

Features

8.5

Support

8.7

Reputation

9.0

Pros

NYDFS-regulated
Solid DeFi integrations on Ethereum + Base
Value-accruing (no rebase)
Trusted Coinbase brand

Cons

Coinbase custody = counterparty risk
25% fee is high

Launched2022TVL~$1BModelValue-accruing cbETHFee25% of rewards

Full Review →Visit Site ↗

Binance (BETH)

Best for: Binance ETH liquid staking token

Overall Score

8.3/10

Score breakdown

Security

8.3

Fees

9.0

8.5

Features

8.5

Support

8.0

Reputation

8.3

Pros

Deep Binance Earn integration
Rebasing daily via BETH balance
Binance ecosystem depth
Low minimum

Cons

Binance custody dependency
Not available in US

Launched2020TVL~$1BModelRebasing BETHNotableBinance Earn integration

Full Review →Visit Site ↗

Side by side

Quick Comparison

#	Name	Score	Best for	Founded	TVL
1	Lido	9.5	Blue-chip liquid staking	2020	~$25B	Review →
2	Rocket Pool (rETH)	9.2	Decentralized ETH LSD	2021 mainnet	~$2B	Review →
3	Frax Finance (frxETH/sfrxETH)	8.8	Yield-max ETH LSD	2022	~$500M	Review →
4	Mantle (mETH)	8.6	Mantle-native LSD with Cook Finance	2023	Mantle L2 primary	Review →
5	Coinbase (cbETH)	8.7	US-regulated LSD receipt	2022	~$1B	Review →
6	Binance (BETH)	8.3	Binance ETH liquid staking token	2020	~$1B	Review →

How we rate every service

Every service on this ranking is evaluated on six criteria, each scored 0–10, with the following weights: Security & Trust (25%), Fees & Costs (20%), User Experience (15%), Features & Coverage (15%), Support & Documentation (10%), and Reputation & Longevity (15%). The weighted average is the overall score.

What each criterion measures

Security & Trust — custody model, audit history, insurance or proof-of-reserves, incident record. This is the highest weight for a reason: security failures compound in ways that no yield or feature advantage can offset.
Fees & Costs — headline trading/withdrawal/deposit fees, hidden costs (spread, slippage, gas), and value at both entry-level and power-user volumes.
User Experience — interface clarity, mobile support, onboarding friction, and how well the product supports both first-time and daily users.
Features & Coverage — asset/chain/integration breadth, advanced tooling, and ecosystem depth vs the segment leader.
Support & Documentation — response times, doc quality, community channels, and how well problems get resolved when they happen.
Reputation & Longevity — years operational, team transparency, community sentiment, and how the service performed through crypto’s hardest moments (bear markets, exchange failures, exploits).

How we test

Our reviewers personally open accounts, transfer funds, execute test transactions, and contact support before publishing a score. We do not accept payment for higher ranking; commercial partnerships (where they exist) are disclosed and never influence position or score. Non-partner services regularly rank above partner services when they perform better.

Rankings are refreshed quarterly. Major changes (fee updates, security incidents, product launches) trigger immediate re-review. Every card shows a "last checked" timestamp so you can see how current the assessment is.

How we rate every service

What each criterion measures

Security & Trust — custody model, audit history, insurance or proof-of-reserves, incident record. This is the highest weight for a reason: security failures compound in ways that no yield or feature advantage can offset.
Fees & Costs — headline trading/withdrawal/deposit fees, hidden costs (spread, slippage, gas), and value at both entry-level and power-user volumes.
User Experience — interface clarity, mobile support, onboarding friction, and how well the product supports both first-time and daily users.
Features & Coverage — asset/chain/integration breadth, advanced tooling, and ecosystem depth vs the segment leader.
Support & Documentation — response times, doc quality, community channels, and how well problems get resolved when they happen.
Reputation & Longevity — years operational, team transparency, community sentiment, and how the service performed through crypto’s hardest moments (bear markets, exchange failures, exploits).

How we test

Frequently asked

Frequently Asked Questions

How did you pick the top services in Best Liquid Staking Protocols 2026?

Every service on this list is scored on six weighted criteria — security (25%), fees (20%), UX (15%), features (15%), support (10%), and reputation (15%). The weighted average produces the overall score. Rankings reflect real hands-on testing, not marketing promises. Full methodology is documented on this page.

How often are these rankings updated?

Full re-reviews happen quarterly. In addition, any major change to a service (fee update, security incident, new product launch, regulatory action) triggers an immediate spot check within days. Each card displays a "last checked" date so you can see how current the score is.

Are your scores affected by commercial partnerships?

No. Our editorial and commercial teams are separated. Where a service has an affiliate or partner relationship it is disclosed openly, but partnerships never influence score, rank, or inclusion. Non-partner services routinely rank above partners when they perform better on our criteria.

Why is one service ranked higher than another with a similar score?

When two services score identically on the overall number, we break the tie using Security first, then Reputation & Longevity, then user-reported reliability from the last 90 days. This ensures the higher-ranked service is the one you can safely stake meaningful value on today.

Can I suggest a service to be reviewed?

Yes. Contact our editorial team with the service name, website, and a short note explaining why it deserves inclusion. Qualifying services (public team, live product, 30+ days in production) enter our review backlog and are scored using the same methodology as everything else on this page.

Explore more